chaser720 wrote:
There are A LOT of factors that go into filling and draining of a ballast system. I don't see anything wrong with your calculations though. I think the error would be to assume constant flow throughout the entire draining process. You'll lose pressure on the bag side of the pump as the bag drains which would slow flow rates. Maybe take time to fill the gallon at start of bag draining, middle then end. Plug that average back into your equation and you should get a closer figure.
Or maybe your calculation is right. ha (I got a D in Fluids lol) But I would hate to think a full 950 bag is only getting 400 lbs.
I agree with your statement; however, I don't think it will drastically change the calculations. Over the course of 4.5 minutes the variance in head pressure would only cause a delta of, what I would guess, is a few gallons tops. That would mean a difference of ~25 pounds. That is negligible. The bag is clearly MUCH larger than the space it sits in. I was most interested in the napkin math since that is a very close estimate to the actual space it is filling into. I wasn't looking for the absolute weight.
This started from the fact that I was very unimpressed with how little the bag was able to fill for the what you could get out of it. Follow that with the fact that every time I take off the bow bag starts to drain a little leaving me to constantly have to top it off. So I decided to order some POP bags for the bow. I did it before I did any math though...it was just a guess that the bag was between 300 and 400 lbs. In order to validate that the lead would equate to what the bag was already I did the listed math to see if I was in the ball park.
There is never a time where you won't want the bow bag filled. My new plan is to keep the lead in the bow. I am going to push more to the nose as well, which should add some "weight" to the bow on its own. Then use the PnP bow bag on top of the seats when we run a filed boat with people and full PnP in the stern.