JohnnyBravo wrote:
80AM,
Side question. Are you running the 2773? I saw you ran other props in past. I have same boat and motor. Any thoughts on the 2773 vs the other props you tried. We wakeboard 80% and surf 20% of the time. I've been running the 2313 so just curious if the 2773 would give me better gas mileage without loosing out on low end torque to plane out. I'm at Norris lake in TN and it looks like we are at 1000 elevation per google.
I've only run the 2773 at the end of the season for a couple days and just from my quick tests it's been the best prop acceleration and cruise RPM speed. The 2313, 2315, 2419 put the engine higher than the peak of the torque curve and your engine RPMs are running very high to get you on plane(all the way to 5300 in fact) but you don't have as much torque as you could at a lower RPM. The 2773 never let the engine spin above 4700RPM. Once the boat gets on plane it ran lower RPMs than the other props I've used.
I spoke to Scott who's head of engineering at Malibu and he said when they swapped to the PCM motors they tested and found the 2249 prop worked best, but they've since re-worked the prop recommendations for the T22/23 since they came out later and found the 2773 worked better.
I have some other issues going on with my boat though so I'm not the best resource for exact comparisons. My boat ran at 44-4500 RPM at 22.4 with full ballast with the 2773. The other boat at the dealer with my bags swapped in and same weight ran 4-4100 RPM at the same speed, so I feel like I have something else going on.