steveA20 wrote:
I'm surprised your boat came with that prop. My 2016 A20 came with the 2249 which is 15x14.25 .105 cup and I also have the 350, the prop did ok with 2800lbs ballast but would not plane out with that weight and wedge down. I tried a 2313 15x12 .105 cup and still no go with that much weight and wedge plus the RPM'S jumped up about 300. I settled with a 2773 15x13 .105 cup. RPM'S came back down and it's much stronger than the 2249.
So you said the 2313 didn't work with that much weight even though it's a more aggressive prop? Or at least I thought it was supposed to be. It has a lower pitch than the 2773 but the cup is also more, which I wouldn't think would have made it perform worse than a higher pitched/lower cupped prop.
mwilliams0135 wrote:
Even if you have some traveling to do, I think the 2313 is worth it. Plus, when you're cruising the motor is barely working so it doesn't burn much fuel. I had the 2313 on a 2015 T23 all year (newer gear ratio) and loved it and it did great on gas!
I just bought a new 2016 T23 w/350 and I had them put the 2419 on there. It is a rocket, unweighted, and even so with stock tanks+wedge (haven't finished my break in to add ballast) and my top end unweighted is a dismal 31mph @5300RPM, 23mph @4000RPM and 18mph @3500RPM. I'm thinking once I add ballast that this thing will be pushing 4500RPM at wakeboard speed which I know will suck gas like no other.
At this point, I'm thinking I won't lose much in RPM stepping down the the 2315, so I'm torn between the pull of 12" pitch on the 2313 and the lower RPM/more top speed with the 13" pitch 2773, but I don't know if that will be enough with 3-4k ballast. Anyone have any numbers on both these?